Growth Library
Insights > Growth Library > Growth Path Advisory > Matching Solution Sprint
Matching Solution Sprint
A validated need is not yet a winning solution
- Teams often jump from a customer problem to the first technically familiar answer.
- Existing capabilities can produce several plausible solution mechanisms.
- Technical feasibility can hide weak adoption, delivery or value capture.
- A fair investment choice requires alternatives built and compared on the same basis.
Use this sprint when the unmet customer needs are known but the best solution is not
- A customer job, underserved outcome and best opportunity field are credible.
- Several product, service, data, AI or business-model mechanisms are possible.
- The board needs a defendable investment, pivot, wait or stop recommendation.
- The solution mechanism and business model must be chosen together.
The governing decision directs the work
Which opportunity–solution combination and initial business model deserve the next investment? The winner must produce the customer outcome, use credible capabilities, support value capture and survive its most dangerous assumptions.
Every solution option is built and compared on the same basis
- Customer outcome, situation and current alternative
- Solution mechanism and expected performance advantage
- Required product, service, data, AI and delivery capabilities
- Customer adoption cost and ability to create, deliver and capture value
- Strategic fit, financing and hard-to-reverse dependencies
The sprint creates options before it ranks them
- Confirm the customer evidence, opportunity set and decision boundaries from step 1.
- Map the technical assets, data, installed base, domain expertise and market access available.
- Create 2–4 materially different solution concepts in a focused Map–Sketch–Decide cycle.
- Peek into the market and technical reality where evidence can change the choice.
- Compare the concepts and build Business Model Canvas v0 for the leading option.
- Define fatal assumptions, evidence gates and stop conditions for positioning and demo work.
Typical deliverables
- Capability and solution-mechanism map
- 2–4 comparable solution concepts
- Solution scorecard and fatal-assumption view
- Rationale for the selected and rejected concepts
- Business Model Canvas v0 and investment boundary
- Board decision pack and evidence plan
Your team provides the facts behind the choice
- One to three evidenced customer opportunities and their step 1 evidence
- Current customer evidence and alternatives
- Owners’ target, time, capital and risk boundaries
- Prepared price, cost, margin, sales and investment information
- Technology, integration, partner and dependency documentation
The base scope protects decision quality
The sprint creates and compares one bounded solution set for one opportunity field and one business. It includes light customer or expert checks when a decisive gap is known; it does not replace broad market research, a technical implementation project or portfolio strategy.
Optional work follows the actual uncertainty
- Wider market and competitor analysis
- TAM–SAM–SOM estimate
- Financial and sensitivity model
- Technical proof of feasibility
- Regulatory, safety, partner or build-buy analysis
Typical delivery time: 4–6 weeks (when step 1 evidence is available)
What we bring together
- Customer evidence, economics and technical feasibility in one comparison
- Industrial delivery and supply-chain constraints included early
- Decision thresholds that can stop weak investments
- Implementation capability available after the gate
The next gate is clear
Management chooses the opportunity–solution combination and initial business model that will be positioned, tested and funded next – or decides that none has earned investment.
Ready to take the next step?
Let’s explore how data can improve your operations, unlock new revenue, and drive smarter decisions.
